Taylor Wofford has thanked me for my input as to his mental acuity. It’s always nice to be noticed.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
“Brown was shot twice in the head, the examination showed: one bullet “entered just above the right eyebrow,” the other “to the very top of the head.” Brown was most likely bending over when the last shot was fired.” Wafford
Both head shots resulted in the bullets traveling in a downward trajectory. The dashed line follows the trajectory inside the body. This shot exited the throat at the collar bone. Brown WAS bending over when these two shots were fired. This is not true only if we have a reasonable explanation not yet heard.
“The autopsy did not reveal signs of a struggle, Dr. Baden said, which casts doubt on an earlier statement by police that a…
Hannity reveals again why he should not interview people.
Dorian Johnson said Brown was shot at the police car. There may be a blood trail that lays out the exact path Brown took after he was shot.
Michael Brown’s “Baden” autopsy was poorly done bordering on fraudulent. The wound on the right upper arm would have a wound track to the right nipple that would make it very difficult or painful or impossible to raise the right arm above the head. The determining factor would be bone and muscle damage.
The real autopsy result may determine if all the witness statements about Brown raising his arms in surrender are false.
Michael Browns crime scene photos show his pants were pulled down by the force of his forward motion when added to Dr Baden’s statement that Brown had a road rash may prove Brown rushed Wilson.
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
A negative result can mean that the person was nowhere near the gun when it was fired, that they were near it but not close enough for GSR to land on them, or it can mean that the GSR deposited on them wore off. GSR is the consistency of flour and typically only stays on the hands of a living person for 4–6 hours. Wiping the hands on anything, even putting them in and out of pockets can transfer GSR off the hands. Victims don’t always get GSR on them, even suicide victims can test negative for GSR.
In the latest ASTM Standard Guide for GSR analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-raySpectrometry (SEM-EDX) particles containing lead, antimony and barium, and respecting some rules related to themorphology and to the presence of other elements are considered characteristic of GSR. The most definitive method to determine if a particle is characteristic of or consistent with GSR is by its elemental profile. An approach to the identification of particles characteristic of or consistent with GSR is to compare the elemental profile of the recovered particulate with that collected from case-specific known source items, such as the recovered weapon, cartridge cases or victim-related items whenever necessary.
Subcutaneous path is altered by large bones in shoulder.
sub·cu·ta·ne·ous ˌsəbkyo͞oˈtānēəs/Submit adjectiveANATOMYMEDICINE situated or applied under the skin. “subcutaneous fat”
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
Known wounds with wound count.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
Dorian Johnson said Brown was shot at the police car. There may be a blood trail that lays out the exact path Brown took after he was shot.
Michael Brown’s “Baden” autopsy was poorly done bordering on fraudulent. The wound on the right upper arm would have a wound track to the right nipple that would make it very difficult or painful or impossible to raise the right arm above the head. The determining factor would be bone and muscle damage.
The real autopsy result may determine if all the witness statements about Brown raising his arms in surrender are false.
Michael Browns crime scene photos show his pants were pulled down by the force of his forward motion when added to Dr Baden’s statement that Brown had a road rash may prove Brown rushed Wilson.
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
Known wounds with wound count.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
The Ferguson PD continues, as the city burns, to insist on making no comments on the case. This is of course proper, but if the DOJ can investigate because of exceptional circumstances, maybe they could release an autopsy that was done in a more professional manner.
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
CNN must not have made Dr. Wecht aware of their prior interview of Dorian Johnson.
The officer put his cruiser in reverse, Bosley said, and pulled up so close that when he opened the door, it bumped Johnson and Brown. “Through the window of his cruiser, he grabs Big Mike by the throat,” Bosley said. “Big Mike tries to move away. The officer grabs his shirt.”
Johnson, who was a student at Lincoln University, saw the officer pull out a gun. “He shoots Big Mike somewhere in the chest or arm,” Bosley said. “Dorian sees blood coming from the chest.”
At one minute thirty seconds in the video Johnson says Brown is shot at close range. This shot could have left stippling or GSR and no one asked Dr Baden about this.
Was Dr Baden intentionally deceptive? The issue of GSR should have been better explained. The wound to Michael…
At no point in her cell phone video does Ms. Crenshaw identify the officer who shot Brown. She says “they shot”, and does not attempt to claim in the interview that she pointed out officer Wilson when she surrendered her video to the police.
In Ferguson, three minutes — and two lives forever changed
Quote from the story:
Johnson took off running and hid behind the first car he saw, Bosley said. “Big Mike runs by him. He says to Dorian, ‘Keep running,’ ” Bosley said. “The officer chases Big Mike. He fires a shot and hits Big Mike in the back. Big Mike turns around. [Brown] puts his hands up. The officer shoots him five or six more times.”
Where is the car Man? The car Johnson hid behind? Yes that car. It’s further down the road because Brown charged the Officer!
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
Known wounds with wound count.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
CNN must not have made Dr. Wecht aware of their prior interview of Dorian Johnson.
The officer put his cruiser in reverse, Bosley said, and pulled up so close that when he opened the door, it bumped Johnson and Brown. “Through the window of his cruiser, he grabs Big Mike by the throat,” Bosley said. “Big Mike tries to move away. The officer grabs his shirt.”
Johnson, who was a student at Lincoln University, saw the officer pull out a gun. “He shoots Big Mike somewhere in the chest or arm,” Bosley said. “Dorian sees blood coming from the chest.”
At one minute thirty seconds in the video Johnson says Brown is shot at close range. This shot could have left stippling or GSR and no one asked Dr Baden about this.
Was Dr Baden intentionally deceptive? The issue of GSR should have been better explained. The wound to Michael Browns right hand could have come from the discharge of the officers firearm. Dorian Johnson said Brown was shot and bleeding. At one minute thirty seconds Brown is shot at close range. This shot could have left stippling and no one asked Dr Baden about this in regards to Brown grasping the officers gun.
The wound is at the base of the thumb, palm side. If all that you have is the location of the wound and the undisputed conflict at the window with the undisputed account of a discharge and bleeding on the part of Brown, failure to address this with Dr Baden amounts to journalistic incompetence.
What about the possibility that the shooting was an accident?
Brown was shot, he has his hands up, but the blood loss causes him to partially lose consciousness and he begins to fall and stumbling toward the officer, Wilson misinterprets this as a charge and shoots?
The Ferguson City PD confirmed that would make no comment on their theory of the incident.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
“Brown was shot twice in the head, the examination showed: one bullet “entered just above the right eyebrow,” the other “to the very top of the head.” Brown was most likely bending over when the last shot was fired.” Wafford
Both head shots resulted in the bullets traveling in a downward trajectory. The dashed line follows the trajectory inside the body. This shot exited the throat at the collar bone. Brown WAS bending over when these two shots were fired. This is not true only if we have a reasonable explanation not yet heard.
“The autopsy did not reveal signs of a struggle, Dr. Baden said, which casts doubt on an earlier statement by police that a struggle between Brown and Wilson precipitated Brown’s shooting. Police have said Brown forced his way inside Wilson’s cruiser, where Wilson shot at Brown for the first time.” Wafford
“Dr Brown did include the reported injuries to Officer Wilson as possible signs of a struggle. But your R.C.I. prevented you hearing that.
Dr. Baden said he found no gunpowder residue on Brown’s skin, which could mean that the muzzle of Wilson’s gun was “at least one or two feet away” from Brown when he was shot. However, Dr. Baden was adamant that he would need to examine Brown’s clothing for gunpowder residue to make a conclusive finding.” Wafford
According to Dorian Johnson, an I.D.’d and accepted witness, Brown was shot at the patrol car. When they saw the blood on Brown, Johnson and he fled.
“If no gunpowder residue was found on Brown’s clothing during the first autopsy, it will likely throw the Ferguson PD’s timeline of events into question.” Wofford
Again, there is the eye witness account by Dorian Johnson. You did what research you thought would be sufficient for Newsweek. But it gets better, as follows:
“Prof. Parcells said a wound on Brown’s right arm was “consistent with a witness statement” that Brown was first shot while facing away from Wilson, but he stressed that he and Dr. Baden could not determine conclusively the trajectories of the bullets that hit Brown—or which direction he was moving—when he was shot. The wounds “could be consistent with going forward or going backward,” Dr. Baden said.” Wofford
And to add a piling on charge to my self:
“An attorney for Brown’s family said at least some of the shots traced a “back-to-front” trajectory, indicating that Brown was shot from behind.” Wofford
And now for his clueless attorney: As soon as Browns family settles on the least stupid attorney, this entry will be updated. Bosley probably will not be heard from again
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
Known wounds with wound count.
Subcutaneous path is altered by large bones in shoulder.
sub·cu·ta·ne·ous ˌsəbkyo͞oˈtānēəs/Submit adjectiveANATOMYMEDICINE situated or applied under the skin. “subcutaneous fat”
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
When I use the word story, I do not mean to imply it is fiction. The story may sound fictional and the ignorance of the reporters may lead you to believe it is.
From a story by FRANCES ROBLES and JULIE BOSMANAUG. 17, 2014, Mo. — “Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer, sparking protests around the nation, was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found.”
If under the theory of “Absence of Malice” if the gun for hire, $10,000 man Dr Baden has a guess, all reason can go out the window.
Michael Brown was running forward, as this photo evidences. When he fell his forward momentum caused his pants to be pulled below his rear.
Dr. Baden our $10K savior says what he didn’t find on Michael Brown, Gun shot residue. Dr Baden says he did not find GSR on a man that everyone admits was in a car when a shot was fired at him, I presume.) suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury”. According to Dr. Michael M. Baden, “It was likely the last of bullets to hit him.”
If you paid me I would most likely lie. But in order for your everyday reporter to meet the absence of malice guideline Dr. Baden need lie first.
Now the fools on TV are allowed to say “He was shot from quite a distance”
“They don’t do that, even as feelings built up among the citizenry that there was a cover-up. We are hoping to alleviate that.” Dr Baden
Liar, liar pants on fire Dr Baden. You have intentionally done just the opposite.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, all the bullets were fired into his front. Most important, they conform with the struggle at the car window based on their position, all in the upper torso and arms.
Dr Baden you are a paid assassin, responsible for ever act and death from now on. There is no wonder you did not accept the $10K blood money.
The expert criminologists who wrote this story also bear some of the blame, an example:
“The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body.”
But as a display of pur ignorance of the rules of commonsense they ad: “However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing”.
Dr. Baden did not have access to his cloths and does not indicate if he even tested for GSR. He could feel completely self satisfied if he saw no visible GSR and gave his opinion based on that. Everyone who understand the intent of a paid gun must know that that form of behavior is common. The “I didn’t see it” excuse.
“The bottom line is that Dr. Michael M. Baden never performed an autopsy on Mike Brown. Instead he signed off on an opinion of a forensic examination completed by a controversial Forensic Pathologist Assistant, who did an evaluation of Mike Brown’s body at the request of the Scheme Team.” Fellow Ship Of The Mind
Michael Brown’s recent autopsy was poorly done bordering on fraudulent. The wound on the right upper arm would have a wound track to the right nipple that would make it very difficult or painful to raise the right arm above the head. The determining factor would be bone and muscle damage.
The real autopsy result will determine if all the witness statements about Brown raising his arms in surrender are false.
Subcutaneous path is altered by large bones in shoulder.
sub·cu·ta·ne·ous ˌsəbkyo͞oˈtānēəs/Submit adjectiveANATOMYMEDICINE situated or applied under the skin. “subcutaneous fat”
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
Standard E15 Firearm Injuries
Documentation of firearm wounds as listed below should include detail sufficient to
provide meaningful information to users of the forensic autopsy report, and to permit
another forensic pathologist to draw independent conclusions based on the
documentation.
The forensic pathologist shall:
E15.1 describe injuries.
E15.2 measure wound size.
E15.3 locate cutaneous wounds of the head, neck, torso, or lower extremities by
measuring from either the top of head or sole of foot.
E15.4 locate cutaneous wounds of the head, neck, torso, or lower extremities by
measuring from either the anterior or posterior midline.
E15.5 locate cutaneous wounds of the upper extremities by measuring from anatomic
landmarks.
E15.6 descriptively locate cutaneous wounds in an anatomic region.
E15.7 describe presence or absence of soot and stippling.
E15.8 describe presence of abrasion ring, searing, muzzle imprint, lacerations
Standard F21 Head
Because some findings are only ascertained by in situ inspection, the scalp and cranial
contents must be examined before and after the removal of the brain so as to identify
signs of disease, injury, and therapy.
Procedures are as follows:
F21.1 the forensic pathologist shall inspect and describe scalp, skull, and meninges.
F21.2 the forensic pathologist shall document any epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid
hemorrhage.
F21.3 the forensic pathologist shall inspect the brain in situ prior to removal and
sectioning.
F21.4 the forensic pathologist shall document purulent material and abnormal fluids.
F21.5 the forensic pathologist or representative removes the dura mater and the forensic
pathologist inspects the skull.
Standard F23 Penetrating Injuries, Including Gunshot and
Sharp Force Injuries
Documentation of penetrating injuries as listed below should include detail sufficient to
provide meaningful information to users of the forensic autopsy report, and to permit
another forensic pathologist to draw independent conclusions based on the
documentation. The recovery and documentation of foreign bodies is important for
evidentiary purposes. Internal wound pathway(s) shall be described according to organs
and tissues and size of defects of these organs and tissues.
The forensic pathologist shall:
F23.1 correlate internal injury to external injury
F23.2 describe and document the track of wound
F23.3 describe and document the direction of wound
F23.4 recover foreign bodies of evidentiary value
F23.5 describe and document recovered foreign body
BadNewsBarnes666's Blog 
Sean Hannity Is An Idiot, Baden Autopsy Reveals
Posted by Larry Barnes on August 23, 2014
Hannity reveals again why he should not interview people.
Dorian Johnson said Brown was shot at the police car. There may be a blood trail that lays out the exact path Brown took after he was shot.
Michael Brown’s “Baden” autopsy was poorly done bordering on fraudulent. The wound on the right upper arm would have a wound track to the right nipple that would make it very difficult or painful or impossible to raise the right arm above the head. The determining factor would be bone and muscle damage.
The real autopsy result may determine if all the witness statements about Brown raising his arms in surrender are false.
Photo credit:
http://www.occupycorporatism.com/home/exclusive-michael-brown-shooting-witness-releases-photo-scene/
Michael Browns crime scene photos show his pants were pulled down by the force of his forward motion when added to Dr Baden’s statement that Brown had a road rash may prove Brown rushed Wilson.
As the truth continues to bounce off their thick skulls, CNN continues to beat the dead horse pulling their drive-by cart.
If you bend Michael Browns right arm can you get a grazing wound and a penetrating wound to line up?
If you put a gun into Michael Browns hand as if he was trying to take it from Officer Wilson can you make a grazing wound and a penetrating wound line up?
If you interview Dr Baden and don’t ask these questions what kind of interviewer are you?
A negative result can mean that the person was nowhere near the gun when it was fired, that they were near it but not close enough for GSR to land on them, or it can mean that the GSR deposited on them wore off. GSR is the consistency of flour and typically only stays on the hands of a living person for 4–6 hours. Wiping the hands on anything, even putting them in and out of pockets can transfer GSR off the hands. Victims don’t always get GSR on them, even suicide victims can test negative for GSR.
In the latest ASTM Standard Guide for GSR analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-raySpectrometry (SEM-EDX) particles containing lead, antimony and barium, and respecting some rules related to themorphology and to the presence of other elements are considered characteristic of GSR. The most definitive method to determine if a particle is characteristic of or consistent with GSR is by its elemental profile. An approach to the identification of particles characteristic of or consistent with GSR is to compare the elemental profile of the recovered particulate with that collected from case-specific known source items, such as the recovered weapon, cartridge cases or victim-related items whenever necessary.
Posted in Sean Hannity, Uncategorized | Tagged: Autopsy, Fox Commentary, Fox News | Leave a Comment »