Using Microsoft Word to Blog

Using Microsoft t

“JIHADIST’S” Purge “JIHADIST” From Vocabulary

Obama administration has argued for a differentiation between good Jihadi and bad Jihadi and a big difference between terrorists and the tenets of Islam. In an extreme act of capitulation the White House in 2009 publicly urged sheeple on the hill to cease using the term “jihadist” – asserting that terrorists are simply extremists. You have to be stupid to ignore the fact that members of Islam call their terroristic acts “jihad”. Two years later, the White House ordered a cleansing of training materials that Islamic groups in, their jihadist struggle, deemed offensive.

The good “J” word “Justice” has been subdued by the bad “J” word “Jihad”. This is done in order to preempt the bad feelings which would be engendered in a good jihadist because of the use of the word to describe a self described bad jihadist.

“What we’ve got here is failure to communicate
Some men you just can’t reach…
So, you get what we had here last week
Which is the way he wants it!
Well, he gets it!
Now, I don’t like it any more than you” GNR (Civil War)

(with included rewrite to the tune of GNR Civil War)

Our hands are tied
while our dreams of peace
are sweept aside
by the bloody hands of
Jihadist Islamist genocide.

It’s just a word
when it’s said
that you have died.
Don’t dare use a word that
hurts their pride.

They are not our friend,
not on our side.
If we don’t speak the truth
then it’s we who have lied.

Our dreams of peace
are sweept aside
by the bloody hands of
Jihadist Islamist genocide.

Don’t want war
and terms you will render.
Peace in two words
“We surrender”

Our dreams of peace
are sweept aside
by the bloody hands of
Jihadist Islamist genocide.

Business Is Booming, On Boston, Benghazi And Bozo’s

Ted Cruz’s comments on the vile Sacramento Bee cartoon: ‘Liberal leanings’ shouldn’t ‘trump respect and decency’ is good. I prefer “don’t get mad, get closer to the truth”.

Droning On – Bill O’Reilly

Droning On – Bill O'Reilly.

Leftards being creatures of habit with a limited scope of resources, I anticipate they will respond to Bill O’Reilly’s recent opinion piece with accusations about the “terror” bombing of Dresden. Well, here is my pre-response:

S.T.F.U. Evil has many tools and a lie is a handle that fits each one. You live in your world, with your tools and handles. You are a tool and you know where the handle goes, now stick it!

A 1953 United States Air Force report defended the operation as the justified bombing of a military and industrial target, which was a major rail transportation and communication center, housing 110 factories and

50,000 workers in support of the German war effort. Dresden was Germany’s seventh-largest city and, according to the RAF at the time, the largest remaining unbombed built-up area. An official 1942 guide to the city described it as “one of the foremost industrial locations of the Reich” and in 1944, the German Army High Command’s Weapons Office listed 127 medium-to-large factories and workshops that were supplying the army with materiel.

Colonel Harold E. Cook, a US POW held in the Friedrichstadt marshaling yard the night before the attacks, later said that “I saw with my own eyes that Dresden was an armed camp: thousands of German troops, tanks and artillery and miles of freight cars loaded with supplies supporting and transporting German logistics towards the east to meet the Russians.”

On 16 February, 1945, the German Propaganda Ministry issued a press release that stated that Dresden had no war industries; it was a city of culture. And now the leftards continue that tradition because they need to get a handle on their tolls of destruction and desolation.

Having been given a paraphrased version of Churchill’s memo by Bottomley, on 29 March, Air Chief Marshal Arthur Harris wrote to the Air Ministry: I … assume that the view under consideration is something like this: no doubt in the past we were justified in attacking German cities. But to do so was always repugnant and now that the Germans are beaten anyway we can properly abstain from proceeding with these attacks. This is a doctrine to which I could never subscribe. Attacks on cities like any other act of war are intolerable unless they are strategically justified. But they are strategically justified in so far as they tend to shorten the war and preserve the lives of Allied soldiers. To my mind we have absolutely no right to give them up unless it is certain that they will not have this effect. I do not personally regard the whole of the remaining cities of Germany as worth the bones of one British Grenadier.

The feeling, such as there is, over Dresden, could be easily explained by any psychiatrist. It is connected with German bands and Dresden shepherdesses. Actually Dresden was a mass of munitions works, an intact government center, and a key transportation point to the East. It is now none of these things.

Alleged McConnell Bugger “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder”

Alleged McConnell Bugger Starts Legal Defense Fund.

 

Nuff said.

WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY “STAR TREK”’ PARODY

“(T)he planet “Notax,” where fraud, money laundering, and alien identity theft appear to be a problem.”

Just a thought on the leftard mentality. If there were no taxes, how would those problems occur?

Confuse, evangel, obfuscate, accuse others of what your doing, demand proof, make counter accusations, deny everything. These are not the traits of a mature mind.

WikiLeaks: Video of US Military Killing Innocent Civilians in Iraq

Of course they edited the section containing audio report of “one individual, looks like he’s got an RPG round laying underneath him”.

Watch the video below at 18:00 to 20:00

Not wanting to be caught peddling a second hand lie, this is what Aljazeera had to say
“AlJazeeraEnglish — April 07, 2010 — WikiLeaks, a website that publishes anonymously sourced documents, has released a video showing what apparently is a US military helicopter firing at unarmed civilians in Iraq. WikiLeaks said the footage, filmed from a helicopter cockpit, shows a missile strike and shooting on a square in a Baghdad neighbourhood in July 2007. The website said 12 civilians were killed in the attack, including two journalists, Namir Nour El Deen and Saeed Chmagh, who worked for the Reuters news agency. This is the full, unedited version of the footage.”

Mr Obama, You Need To Know Income Is Earned, It Is Not Distributed

It is not social justice, it is not helpful, it is just welfare. And the history of welfare has shown it destroys the humanity of those who become dependent on it. Just look at the demonicRAT party, deadbeats, burdens on society and moral degenerates.

The NYT’s is just as unaware of reality as Obama

For all the political and economic certainties about health reform, one thing seems clear: The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic integrity since attacks on integrity began with the formation of the deminicRAT party.

Over most of that period cited by the NYT, The 1970’s to present, an article states that “government policy and market forces have been moving in the same direction, both increasing inequality.” Happy with their tried and true class warfare, the NYT states that “The pretax incomes of the wealthy have soared since the late 1970s, while their tax rates have fallen more than rates for the middle class and poor.” Failing to point out that demonicRATs have participated in the government that has ensured this condition exists and continues.

Nearly every major aspect of the health bill pushes in the direction of the destruction of the middle class. This fact helps explain why Mr. Obama was willing to spend so much political capital on the issue. Only a fool would say that destruction of the founding principle even though it did not appear to be his top priority as a presidential candidate. Beyond the health reform(Freedom Retardation Bill)’s damage to the medical system, it is the centerpiece of his deliberate effort to end what historians have called the age of Reagan and kill the last bastion of quality medical treatment in the world.

Speaking to an audience Obamazombies and puddle (of mud) Democratic legislators and White House aides who could not pass an FBI background check, Mr. Obama stated the obvious truth that health reform would “mark a new (reinvigorated, downward trend into a 1,000 years of darkness) season in America.” He added, “We have now just enshrined, as soon as I sign this bill, the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care.” Missing I guess the lesson from history that, “He who would trade liberty for security deserves neither.

Hopefully no one has noticed that the party of “no phone taps”, will now tap your medical records.

Continuing class warfare:
“The bill is the most sweeping piece of federal legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965. It aims to smooth out one of the roughest edges in American society — the inability of many people to afford medical care after they lose a job or get sick,” according to the NYT. But their most demented claim just happens to be that “it would do so in large measure by taxing the rich.” The taxation of the rich will in no “large measure” pay for the government mandates. The care will be paid for by rationing and reductions in the quality of care that those person would now receive under the present system. The system now allows all person to receive the same quality care regardless of ability to pay, proving the NYT is demented and lying to to promote their evil desires.

The NYT times reports that “A big chunk of the money to pay for the bill comes from lifting payroll taxes on households making more than $250,000, with the tax bill for households making more than $1 million a year to be $46,000.” This is an example of filling in the amount you want to pay and then worry about the truth later.

The low quality care will be foisted on those unwilling to buy quality insurance plans to benefits, meanwhile, those making less than $88,200 for a family of four, will find that the government does not have the funds to subsidize adequate care. Many of the poor are already covered by Medicaid and the option to just lower enrollment requirements and raise taxes is beyond the tyrants in the capitol. The common refrain that “Insurance costs are also likely to drop for higher-income workers at small companies”, is true, in that small companies will drop the coverage all together.

“Finally, the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality. In the broadest sense, insurance is meant to spread the costs of an individual’s misfortune — illness, death, fire, flood — across society. Since the late 1970s, though, the share of Americans with health insurance has shrunk. As a result, the gap between the economic well-being of the sick and the healthy has been growing, at virtually every level of the income distribution.” reports the NYT. This statement is farce dissolving into tragedy. It is akin to saying that the number of people who have died is increasing every day, and to solve this problem well no longer observe Mondays and Fridays.

First of all, income is earned, it is not distributed. Second, they provide a glaring example of the ignorance of cause and effect, and what cause can be reasonably attributed to an effect. Third they state “the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality”, then fail to explain how the “economic well-being of the sick” will be equalized with that of the well.

Lies about the projection of “95 percent of people” being “covered”, proves the old saying that figures lie and liars figure. The proposition that “affluent families” will benefit “by being able to buy a plan that can no longer charge more for pre-existing conditions”, denies the fact that all coverage will be more expensive even if they have no pre-existing condition. Being consoled by the fact that affluent families “insurance will be somewhat more expensive”, ignores the fact that it is already more expensive because of the uninsured.

“Maybe the bill’s attempts to hold down the recent growth of medical costs will prove a big success, or maybe the results will be modest and inadequate”, says the Times. But the word which will be used by thinking persons, and the Times did not use, is disaster.

“Legislative majorities come and go,” David Frum, said on Sunday. “This health care bill is forever”, maybe, but it will never affect me. I am not going to pay for it, every law has loop holes.

Obama: Americans Do Not Deserve To Prosper

The NYT’s concurs

For all the political and economic certainties about health reform, one thing seems clear: The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic integrity since attacks on integrity began with the formation of the deminicRAT party.

Over most of that period cited by the NYT, The 1970’s to present, an article states that “government policy and market forces have been moving in the same direction, both increasing inequality.” Happy with their tried and true class warfare, the NYT states that “The pretax incomes of the wealthy have soared since the late 1970s, while their tax rates have fallen more than rates for the middle class and poor.” Failing to point out that demonicRATs have participated in the government that has ensured this condition exists and continues.

Nearly every major aspect of the health bill pushes in the direction of the destruction of the middle class. This fact helps explain why Mr. Obama was willing to spend so much political capital on the issue. Only a fool would say that destruction of the founding principle even though it did not appear to be his top priority as a presidential candidate. Beyond the health reform(Freedom Retardation Bill)’s damage to the medical system, it is the centerpiece of his deliberate effort to end what historians have called the age of Reagan and kill the last bastion of quality medical treatment in the world.

Speaking to an audience Obamazombies and puddle (of mud) Democratic legislators and White House aides who could not pass an FBI background check, Mr. Obama stated the obvious truth that health reform would “mark a new (reinvigorated, downward trend into a 1,000 years of darkness) season in America.” He added, “We have now just enshrined, as soon as I sign this bill, the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care.” Missing I guess the lesson from history that, “He who would trade liberty for security deserves neither.

Hopefully no one has noticed that the party of “no phone taps”, will now tap your medical records.

Continuing class warfare:
“The bill is the most sweeping piece of federal legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965. It aims to smooth out one of the roughest edges in American society — the inability of many people to afford medical care after they lose a job or get sick,” according to the NYT. But their most demented claim just happens to be that “it would do so in large measure by taxing the rich.” The taxation of the rich will in no “large measure” pay for the government mandates. The care will be paid for by rationing and reductions in the quality of care that those person would now receive under the present system. The system now allows all person to receive the same quality care regardless of ability to pay, proving the NYT is demented and lying to to promote their evil desires.

The NYT times reports that “A big chunk of the money to pay for the bill comes from lifting payroll taxes on households making more than $250,000, with the tax bill for households making more than $1 million a year to be $46,000.” This is an example of filling in the amount you want to pay and then worry about the truth later.

The low quality care will be foisted on those unwilling to buy quality insurance plans to benefits, meanwhile, those making less than $88,200 for a family of four, will find that the government does not have the funds to subsidize adequate care. Many of the poor are already covered by Medicaid and the option to just lower enrollment requirements and raise taxes is beyond the tyrants in the capitol. The common refrain that “Insurance costs are also likely to drop for higher-income workers at small companies”, is true, in that small companies will drop the coverage all together.

“Finally, the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality. In the broadest sense, insurance is meant to spread the costs of an individual’s misfortune — illness, death, fire, flood — across society. Since the late 1970s, though, the share of Americans with health insurance has shrunk. As a result, the gap between the economic well-being of the sick and the healthy has been growing, at virtually every level of the income distribution.” reports the NYT. This statement is farce dissolving into tragedy. It is akin to saying that the number of people who have died is increasing every day, and to solve this problem well no longer observe Mondays and Fridays.

First of all, income is earned, it is not distributed. Second, they provide a glaring example of the ignorance of cause and effect, and what cause can be reasonably attributed to an effect. Third they state “the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality”, then fail to explain how the “economic well-being of the sick” will be equalized with that of the well.

Lies about the projection of “95 percent of people” being “covered”, proves the old saying that figures lie and liars figure. The proposition that “affluent families” will benefit “by being able to buy a plan that can no longer charge more for pre-existing conditions”, denies the fact that all coverage will be more expensive even if they have no pre-existing condition. Being consoled by the fact that affluent families “insurance will be somewhat more expensive”, ignores the fact that it is already more expensive because of the uninsured.

“Maybe the bill’s attempts to hold down the recent growth of medical costs will prove a big success, or maybe the results will be modest and inadequate”, says the Times. But the word which will be used by thinking persons, and the Times did not use, is disaster.

“Legislative majorities come and go,” David Frum, said on Sunday. “This health care bill is forever”, maybe, but it will never affect me. I am not going to pay for it, every law has loop holes.

Obama Declares War On Americans Because Of His Demented Beliefs

The NYT’s concurs

For all the political and economic certainties about health reform, one thing seems clear: The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic integrity since attacks on integrity began with the formation of the deminicRAT party.

Over most of that period cited by the NYT, The 1970’s to present, an article states that “government policy and market forces have been moving in the same direction, both increasing inequality.” Happy with their tried and true class warfare, the NYT states that “The pretax incomes of the wealthy have soared since the late 1970s, while their tax rates have fallen more than rates for the middle class and poor.” Failing to point out that demonicRATs have participated in the government that has ensured this condition exists and continues.

Nearly every major aspect of the health bill pushes in the direction of the destruction of the middle class. This fact helps explain why Mr. Obama was willing to spend so much political capital on the issue. Only a fool would say that destruction of the founding principle even though it did not appear to be his top priority as a presidential candidate. Beyond the health reform(Freedom Retardation Bill)’s damage to the medical system, it is the centerpiece of his deliberate effort to end what historians have called the age of Reagan and kill the last bastion of quality medical treatment in the world.

Speaking to an audience Obamazombies and puddle (of mud) Democratic legislators and White House aides who could not pass an FBI background check, Mr. Obama stated the obvious truth that health reform would “mark a new (reinvigorated, downward trend into a 1,000 years of darkness) season in America.” He added, “We have now just enshrined, as soon as I sign this bill, the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care.” Missing I guess the lesson from history that, “He who would trade liberty for security deserves neither.

Hopefully no one has noticed that the party of “no phone taps”, will now tap your medical records.

Continuing class warfare:
“The bill is the most sweeping piece of federal legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965. It aims to smooth out one of the roughest edges in American society — the inability of many people to afford medical care after they lose a job or get sick,” according to the NYT. But their most demented claim just happens to be that “it would do so in large measure by taxing the rich.” The taxation of the rich will in no “large measure” pay for the government mandates. The care will be paid for by rationing and reductions in the quality of care that those person would now receive under the present system. The system now allows all person to receive the same quality care regardless of ability to pay, proving the NYT is demented and lying to to promote their evil desires.

The NYT times reports that “A big chunk of the money to pay for the bill comes from lifting payroll taxes on households making more than $250,000, with the tax bill for households making more than $1 million a year to be $46,000.” This is an example of filling in the amount you want to pay and then worry about the truth later.

The low quality care will be foisted on those unwilling to buy quality insurance plans to benefits, meanwhile, those making less than $88,200 for a family of four, will find that the government does not have the funds to subsidize adequate care. Many of the poor are already covered by Medicaid and the option to just lower enrollment requirements and raise taxes is beyond the tyrants in the capitol. The common refrain that “Insurance costs are also likely to drop for higher-income workers at small companies”, is true, in that small companies will drop the coverage all together.

“Finally, the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality. In the broadest sense, insurance is meant to spread the costs of an individual’s misfortune — illness, death, fire, flood — across society. Since the late 1970s, though, the share of Americans with health insurance has shrunk. As a result, the gap between the economic well-being of the sick and the healthy has been growing, at virtually every level of the income distribution.” reports the NYT. This statement is farce dissolving into tragedy. It is akin to saying that the number of people who have died is increasing every day, and to solve this problem well no longer observe Mondays and Fridays.

First of all, income is earned, it is not distributed. Second, they provide a glaring example of the ignorance of cause and effect, and what cause can be reasonably attributed to an effect. Third they state “the bill will also reduce a different kind of inequality”, then fail to explain how the “economic well-being of the sick” will be equalized with that of the well.

Lies about the projection of “95 percent of people” being “covered”, proves the old saying that figures lie and liars figure. The proposition that “affluent families” will benefit “by being able to buy a plan that can no longer charge more for pre-existing conditions”, denies the fact that all coverage will be more expensive even if they have no pre-existing condition. Being consoled by the fact that affluent families “insurance will be somewhat more expensive”, ignores the fact that it is already more expensive because of the uninsured.

“Maybe the bill’s attempts to hold down the recent growth of medical costs will prove a big success, or maybe the results will be modest and inadequate”, says the Times. But the word which will be used by thinking persons, and the Times did not use, is disaster.

“Legislative majorities come and go,” David Frum, said on Sunday. “This health care bill is forever”, maybe, but it will never affect me. I am not going to pay for it, every law has loop holes.